Skip to content →

Category: culture

Pigeons Vs. Architects

pigeon image

In San Francisco, there’s a lot of public discussion about the architectural designs submitted for the new Transbay Terminal. It will substantially change the City’s skyline and the feel of that part of downtown. If you’ve ever visited the current Transbay Terminal, you know we need a change.

Skidmore Transbay Design

The three architectural firms have submitted lots of provocative plans and pictures about how the new terminal will look. They all want to make their mark of the skyline of a major international city.

Things never look so perfect as they do in the planning stage. Pure vision is a wonderful thing. But as Carl Philipp Gottfried von Clausewitz once said, no plan survives its first encounter with the enemy.

Pigeon Spikes

That brings us to Pigeon Spikes. No, the image above isn’t one of the new tower designs. It’s the kind of thing that’s added to “great architecture” once it encounters the pigeon. It’s the ugly set of spikes added to ledges and surfaces on which pigeons might roost.

In the war between pigeons and architects, I’d have to say that the pigeons are winning. I’d like to challenge the architects to design the new Transbay Terminal so that it doesn’t require the subsequent addition of pigeon spikes (or even worse chicken wire nets). You can’t win a battle you don’t plan for.

Comments closed

The Bees of the Invisible

“We are the bees of the invisible,” Rilke wrote to Hulewicz, his translator, “Frantically we gather in the honey of the visible—to store it in the great golden hive of the invisible.”

The process of linking one thing to another on the Web may someday contain a kind of poetry. Today we link things together because they have a certain kind of coherence or utility. But, in truth, in life, the kind of links that stay with us are the ones the produce unexpected connections.

Comments closed

The Ombudsman: Understanding Wisdom, Power, the Weak and the Marginalized

Roses for Stalin

There’s a lot of capital invested in “the wisdom of crowds” Web companies. This idea that “we” are smarter than “me” is generally a good one. I find the collaborative filtering that Delicious provides a great way to find new information on topics of interest, or to follow the link blogs of people of interest. Obviously there’s a big unexplored territory here.

Sometimes it seems as though the Web has no sense of history, no reference points outside itself. The concept of the “wisdom of crowds” seems to live in some kind of socialist realist illustration from the Soviet era. Happy, productive workers collectively producing the best of the best. The crowd’s idea is better than an individual’s—and you can make some money off of the value of that better idea. In this case when we say “the crowd” is “wise,” we give the crowd power over what counts as “wise.” And of course “wisdom” is always better, smarter, and by definition, more “wise.”

And yet, when you replace the word “wisdom” with the word “power” and start doing some reading you’ll immediately encounter the dark side of this concept. Elias Canetti’s Crowds and Power is one of the classics of the literature. Crowds, both consciously and unconsciously, create a dominant center and push things to the margins. (The opposite of The Long Tail) Sometimes this kind of filtering can be good and valuable, sometimes it can be cruel and dangerous. Instead of the Socialist Realist image of crowds, think of the image created by Billie Holiday in the song Strange Fruit. The crowd is a double-edged sword—it cuts both ways. The sword is real and the sword is sharp.

Jason Calacanis has a related problem with Mahalo. The wisdom of his editors creates the value of Mahalo’s search engine results pages. And there’s no question that Mahalo does create value. But if we replace the word “wisdom” with “power” we uncover the potential dark side of this concept. And that’s where we come to the concept of the Ombudsman.

If the future of the Web is really going to be filled with Social Networks and Distributed Editors filtering our experience, the future must also be filled with the Ombudman. Have the builders of these online filtering systems thought about how to make injustices right? Do they have an algorithm for that? Or is a human process of arbitration the only way to really set things right? Can this kind of process just be tacked on at the end? Shouldn’t it be an essential part of the structural design? Of course, the reason it’s not is that “justice” isn’t part of what creates value, rather it’s a pure expense. Although in the long run, it’s also part of what will make any such service a trusted authority. (See Reputation Management and Craig as Customer Service Rep)

It’s well understood what an Ombudsman is supposed to do, the question exposed by this little ramble of thought is: can an Ombudsman really provide a check and balance to the power of the crowd? Could an Ombudsman save Frankenstein’s monster from the crowd?

One Comment

Gypsy Technology: Gogol Bordello & Topo Gigio

I was watching Henry Rollins’s show on the Independent Film Channel last night. The interview was Gore Vidal and the music guest was Gogol Bordello, a gypsy punk band. To me it was a reminder of how much television has changed.

To have a show on one of the old three major broadcast networks was a big thing. What does it mean to have a show on one of 500 or 600 channels? And what does it mean now in the world of video podcasts? Which was more radical, The Ed Sullivan Show or The Henry Rollins Show? Ed introduced The Beatles to the country. Last night Rollins introduced Gogol Bordello to a small IFC cable audience. Although this is more similar to Sullivan introducing the little Italian mouse Topo Gigio to america. Mass media introduces the margins to the center.

I’m a sucker for gypsy music. I was very happy Henry Rollins made the introduction. Just as in Ed Sullivan’s day, media and technology is wonderful for introducing the new—which is not to be confused with the popular.

Comments closed