…to sleep, perchance to dream…
Comments closedAuthor: cgerrish
Unemployed philosopher
This afternoon I took a drive over to the Presidio to see Andy Goldsworthy’s sculpture called “The Spire.” Kenneth Baker of the SF Chronicle described it:
“Spire” consists of 37 steel-armatured cypress tree trunks, felled as part of the Presidio’s re-forestation program. The structure’s core sits below ground in a metal sleeve enclosed in a massive reinforced concrete base.
The project isn’t complete yet; it is still under construction, fenced off and surrounded by bulldozers and other heavy equipment. Even at this stage, it’s an impressive site. A spire generally sits atop a building as a kind of ornament. Goldsworthy’s Spire sits on the earth, among trees both young and old. Wikipedia describes spires:
Symbolically, spires have two functions. The first is to proclaim a martial power. A spire, with its reminiscence of the spear point, gives the impression of strength. The second is to reach up toward the skies. The celestial and hopeful gesture of the spire is one reason for its association with religious buildings. A spire on a church or cathedral is not just a symbol of piety, but is often seen as a symbol of the wealth and prestige of the order, or patron who commissioned the building
Goldsworthy says that he hopes he can give this single spire some company in the near future.
One Comment
I’m thinking about a media player/writer that consumes a sequence of 140 character microblogging posts that contain TinyURLs. The viewing area of this application shows the specified video, audio, image or text. The URLs are decorated with the start point and end point of the quoted material.
The player can be pointed at purchased lists, personally created lists, shared lists, dynamically created lists, and real-time lists from affinity groups or individual authors. The lists can be filtered to show only video, only audio, only images or only text. Of course, one can select any combination of media types as well.
It’s also a writer, these same microblogging posts can be composed, URLs constructed and attached, and then sent to the real-time stream. It can also create sequences and share them. Other controls include:
- Rewind
- Fast-Forward
- Slow-Motion
- Pause
- Skip to next
- Skip to specified keyword
- Mark, and return to Mark
- Loop
- Copy and Paste
- Auto-Scroll text at specified reading speed
All devices, mobile or stationary, are supported– as are all syndication formats RSS, Atom, etc. The viewable output can consumed on iPhones, Android devices, Kindle, Chumby, computers, televsions and GPS devices.
Some additional uses for the system might be:
- Turn-by-turn GPS directions
- Cooking Recipes
- Assembly instructions
- Music instruction
- Any kind of education / testing content
An example of a live two-way sequence might be: I send you a sequence that shows you how to get from where you are to my house. You get halfway there and don’t understand the next instruction. You ping me with a question about that part of the direction sequence. I respond in real time with a clarification. With the additional clarification you’re back on track. The instruction set we discuss, either via text or voice, exists in a format we both can access and reference any point in the sequence.
Think of it as XML for content.
Comments closed
Any discussion of ‘Track’ seems to require a brief definition. By now we’re familiar with ‘Search,’ it’s the process of examining everything in an index to find keyword matches– and then ranking the results in the most useful order. ‘Track’ is a filter on the firehose of information generated by the microblogging space. It’s stuff that’s not in the search engine index yet, it’s what people are saying and thinking right now. The ideal time parameters around track are the rhythms of the conversation. Tracked results should reach one quickly enough to be able to respond to a question or statement without the thread of the conversation being lost. Track expands the public instant message dialogue beyond a personal directed social graph. When I track a topic, I’ll see messages from anyone who uses the words I’m tracking.
Our recent Presidential campaign featured diametrically opposed approaches to organization. One campaign employed a bottom-up strategy; the other preferred the top-down approach. This got me thinking about track and the difference between top-down and bottom-up strategies. A top-down strategy is easier to support in that the tracked keywords are very limited and they don’t change unless consciously changed. The creation of an intentional scarcity of tracked keywords also lays the foundation for an economic model.
Here are two approaches to a limited track keyword set:
A bottom-up strategy is harder to support, every user in the system could have a separate list of keyword filters for the full stream. That’s a lot of computing that needs to be done very quickly. As events unfold around us in the world, each user’s set of keywords would change to aid in the discovery around the new topics emerging. The full set of track filters would be constantly shifting and morphing.
Search uses a top-down strategy to prioritize keyword results. You probably want to see the results that most people want to see or think are important. The brilliance of the modern search engine is that it makes that calculation for everything it indexes. It arrives at top-down through bottom-up voting on importance. Services like Mahalo attempt to only provide extended results for popular searches– converging to the top of the pyramid.
Here are some examples of services trying to create lists of what’s popular:
If you track what’s popular, depending on the community providing the attention data, you quickly converge on the least interesting topics. You’re only seeing what everybody knows.
And the broader the community, the more quickly you end up with The National Enquirer or the World Weekly News. Now that the election is over, take a look at the trending topics on Search.Twitter.com. Occasionally you’ll see a micro-community poke through with a hashtag for a particular conference or event, but mostly there’s little of interest.
Each of us is a unique nexus of connections tracing our path through the world. Our individual curiosity provides the fuel, the focus, the set of keywords we carry with us to make sense of, and create, the future. The difference between all of us having the power to track the stream and only the most popular keywords being tracked is the difference between all the books in the world and the magazines available at an airport bookstore. For a short period of time we all had track, now track is the privilege of the few.
For some reason, I’m reminded of a song by Laurie Anderson for tape-bow violin based on a quote by Lenin:
Comments closed